我们结婚了

DC fixed Oct 31 for hearing arguments on the bail application in the money laundering case against Satyendar Jain_我的网站

A |     New Delhi, Oct, 20 (UNI) A Delhi Special Court fixed October, 31 for hearing arguments on the bail application in the matter registered under the provisions of Prevention Money Laundering Act against Delhi's Health Minister Satyendar.

Special Judge Vikash Dhull after hearing arguments in the bail application on behalf of Vaibhav Jain and Ankush Jain said, " Put up the matter on 27.10.2022 for hearing arguments on the bail application of Satyendar Jain."

Counsel for Jain submitted before the Court that main counsel Sh. N. Hariharan who is to argue the bail application on behalf of Jain has to go for some medical checkup and will not be available before 31.10.2022.

After hearing the request on behalf of Jain the Court said, "Put up on 31.10.2022 for arguments on the bail application of accused Satyendar Kumar Jain. Superintendent, Tihar Jail is directed to produce accused Satyendar Kumar Jain, Vaibhav Jain and Ankush Jain through video conferencing on 31.10.2022"



The Principal District & Sessions Court of Rouse Avenue, New Delhi on September, 22 transfer the matter registered under the provisions of Prevention Money Laundering Act against Delhi's Health Minister Satyendar Jain from the Court of Special Judge Geetanjali Goel's to Special Judge Vikash Dhull. Jain challenged the order of transfer in High Court and Apex Court and later on withdraw the same from Apex Court. Now the matter is at the stage of hearing arguments on bail application of Jain.



Government Counsel for ED opposed the bail application by submitting that Jain served as a Health Minister in Delhi may managed to get forged documents and can influence the doctors and Jail official.



ED has earlier opposed the bail application of Satyendar Jain by submitting that if bail granted he may influence the co-accused, witnesses and other documents related to the case.

Counsel for Jain opposed the submission of ED by submitting that this is a malafide application to derail the trial and to prolong the custody of Jain. He contented that Jain is neither a Health Minister nor Jail Minister but is in jail and because the hospital where Jain was admitted under the control of Delhi Government is no ground to alleged a bias in the case.



Investigating Agency has arrested Satyendar Jain in this Matter on May, 30 under the provisions of PMLA and he is now in the judicial custody at Tihar.



Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in its chargesheet has alleged amassing assets to the tune of Rs. 1.47 crore in Disproportionate Assets case while Enforcement Directorate has submitted the attachment of Rs. 4.81 crore in connection with money laundering investigation.

UNI XC GNK。    2026年8月24日，据idrw.org（印度国防研究之翼）；综合《The Week》、希腊《Ta Nea》等多家媒体，土耳其媒体试图将印度拖入以色列-土耳其冲突，地区紧张局势升级。        土耳其媒体正越来越频繁地试图将印度与以色列和土耳其之间迅速恶化的战略对抗联系起来。尽管新德里并非以土对抗的一方，但土耳其媒体已将印度描绘为一个更广泛战略联盟的一部分。    以土对抗升级，印度被“拉入战局”    事件的直接背景是以色列与土耳其关系的急剧恶化。2026年8月18日，以色列对叙利亚西北部的阿布·杜胡尔空军基地发动空袭，称此举旨在阻止土耳其在该基地部署军事力量，而安卡拉方面则予以谴责。

B | 此后，土耳其媒体开始将印度与以色列、希腊、塞浦路斯和阿联酋联系在一起，暗示安卡拉可能面临一个更广泛的“战略联盟”。    土耳其媒体的“反土三角”论调    这种叙事并非首次出现。2026年1月，土耳其媒体就曾将印度与阿联酋的接触解读为“由以色列、印度、希腊组成的反土耳其恶魔三角”。2026年6月，土耳其国防专家对印度与希腊、塞浦路斯迅速扩大的安全伙伴关系表示担忧，尤其担心希腊和塞浦路斯可能采购印度的布拉莫斯超音速巡航导弹。希腊媒体也描述了“希腊-以色列-印度-阿联酋-塞浦路斯”轴心的出现。    印度战略自主的底线    然而，报道指出，日益增长的战略关系与正式的“反土联盟”之间存在重要区别。印度与以色列、希腊的防务关系由自身战略利益驱动。印度历来保持战略自主，避免正式绑定军事联盟，其外交政策远比媒体描绘的“简单站队”复杂得多。    从土耳其角度看，其担忧有战略基础——以色列正阻止土耳其势力在叙利亚扩张。但从安卡拉的视角解读印度的独立外交决策，并将其视为反土战略的证据，则过于牵强。印度直接卷入以土军事对抗的动机极其有限。    因此，土耳其媒体将印度置于以土争端报道的核心，更多反映了安卡拉对自身战略环境变化的感知，而非印度的真实意图。返回，查看更多。

C |

Current article:http://no9dm.sunaichitikouchua.bond/list_20fv9ue/7627.html

Published on:21:51:21